Flasher Archive

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re[2]: Shockwave Licensing Petition - shockwave *is* free!
From: Mark Hayhurst
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 1998 09:32:56 +0100


John,

I'm sure everyone appreciates the effort you put in on this question
so regularly! However, while one could suggest that who are we to
question MM's licensing policy it does seem illogical and obstructive.

You seem to say that the purpose behind licensing redistribution is
financial (pays for "the engineering effort that goes in") and yet
surely no _additional_ engineering effort does go in. Moreover, the
stated alternative is to point users at web downloads. I would gate to
add up the amount of bandwidth, ergo time, that has been spent in this
forum and others like it that cover how to do detection and download.
In my experience _none_ of the solutions to date solve this problem
and _all_ result in hassle for user and developer alike. Aftershock
itself simply does not work! that is, it fails under enough
circumstances that we cannot use it.

It has been pointed out that a back door to getting the OCX versions
is to install IE or any other product that bundles Flash. That's a
sledgehammer to crack a nut. Besides MM gets no money for that (over
anbd above whatever MS have 'paid' you already for the deal) and
neither do you get to find out that your number of installed Flash
players has gone up by one.

It seems to me that the only ones who suffer in this whole deal are
those who are doing an awful lot to promote and evangelise Flash in
the first place - the developers - often indivduals or small companies
for whom the licensing deals (at least the ones we've heard about)
would be outside budget.

It has to be asked whether whoever came up with this bizarre policy at
MM has any plans to review it or explain it ?

Mark



______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Shockwave Licensing Petition - shockwave *is* free!
Author: jdowdellatmacromedia [dot] com at INTERNET
Date: 31/03/98 13:57


At 6:19 PM 3/27/98, Rob Koberg - Home wrote:
>If you sign up with microsoft to be a distributor of their
>browser (which is free and easy). Then you automatically get to
>distribute several other things for free of which I believe are the
>controls for Director and Flash.


That's what I've been saying all along!! <exasperated wail>

Any websurfer is free to download their own personal copy of the Shockwave
engines. They'll be auto-detected, they'll be auto-installed, they'll
always be up-to-date and otherwise Hygenically Sanitary.

If you have a client that uses web browsers but does NOT go on the web at
all, then their browser and operating system CDs have licensed the
Shockwave engines and have installers. If you're only "surfing" offline,
then your browser CD has Shockwave.

Now, if you have a business client, and they want to use web browsers, and
they don't want their employees on that scary internet, and they don't let
people install their own software from CD, and so they want to put
everything on their own server... well, then *that* is when they get
charged for the engineering effort done here. (It really does help to pay
the bills.)

We also get licensing fees from those creating *applications* that use
Flash or Director as component multimedia engines. Visual Basic and Delphi
people and all are getting big on this, and we do charge them more for
redistribution than we do web designers.

Rephrased, hey-yeah-sure-absolutely *do* install from browser or OS CD if
you wish.



>I believe the argument MM will give
>is, "Well, your clients won't be getting the most up to date version."
>What I say to that is great. Who cares?

I do usually note this, when I retype the basic message with bonechilling
regularity, but I also add that you can absolutely set minimum versions
with the free Smart Shockwave button. There is no need to demand the latest
version, but you can certainly specify a minimum version in your HTML, and
the Smart Shockwave technology effort makes this easy.

Rephrased, it's not always necessary to play back in the latest engines.
That's a design decision that you can make, yourself.


Summary: Anyone can download their own copy. There are also licensed copies
on your browser and OS CDs. Licensing is only for those who wish to
distribute the core engine themselves, and besides a monetary cost there are
also security, versioning, and support costs with it too.


jd


John Dowdell, Macromedia Tech Support, San Francisco CA US

Private email options: http://www.macromedia.com/support/priority.html
Search technotes: http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
Search DIRECT-L: http://www.mcli.dist.maricopa.edu/director/digest/
Online savvy: http://search.yahoo.com/bin/search?p=netiquette
Entertainment on the web: http://shockrave.macromedia.com/



------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-manageratshocker [dot] com. Problems to: owneratshocker [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-manageratshocker [dot] com

------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-manageratshocker [dot] com. Problems to: owneratshocker [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-manageratshocker [dot] com


Replies
  MIDI and Flash, Nag Champa

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]