Re: FLASH: Reaction to SW 7.0.2

[Nigel Randsley-Pena]

Warren,


I've followed your posts on another list on this matter. I do agree with

you up to a certain point on some of your positions even though others

have been able to express them in a better manner. Anyway this is

another list dedicated to another programme.

On this list I can not agree at all on similar positions.

First a small but very important difference : The default for Flash is

set to swRemote=false, so for us lucky Flashers it's business as usual.

Second Flash is all about web unlike the other programme, and no this

does not mean the other programme isn't also 'about web', so something

like the remote is quite good.

Third, what MM marketing guys are doing with shockwave does not hurt

Flash at all, even though I know DG will disagree, in fact it could help

an even further acceptance of Flash as a web content authoring tool,

pity that they don't seem to see this and are concentrating so hard on

the other programme. I think JD is feeling this and has decided to start

crusading for the remote on this list, and rightly so in my opinion.

When Flashers start to see the benefits they can gather from enabling

the remote we might start seeing some positive remarks about the remote.


Nigel


------------------------------------------------------------------------

To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an

email to

list-managershocker [dot] com

.  Problems to:

ownershocker [dot] com

N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.

For info on digest mode send: info flasher to

list-managershocker [dot] com