Flasher Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | FLASH: RE: FLASH's future |
From: | Timothy Palmer-Benson |
Date: | Sat, 27 Feb 1999 16:07:15 GMT |
Hi:
Just got through a Flash workshop at the Ojaji Digital
Arts Centre which was conducted by Josh Ulm. The class was very good but I
was alarmed to learn that the W3 or whatever it is called is not or has not
adopted Flash for its new standards. What does this portend for Flash? I was
told that it might not be so popular a year or so from now, which then
raises the question of whether it is worth spending a lot of time on. Anyone
care to comment or critique these statements?
Regards
Tim Palmer-Benson
Morgan, VT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-managershocker [dot] com. Problems to: ownershocker [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-managershocker [dot] com
Replies
Re: FLASH: RE: FLASH's future, David Mendels
Re: FLASH: RE: FLASH's future, Troy M. Gilbert
Replies
Re: FLASH: addendum: pngs appear very da, Colin Moock
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]