Flasher Archive

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]

Subject: FLASH: RE: FLASH's future
From: Timothy Palmer-Benson
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 16:07:15 GMT

Just got through a Flash workshop at the Ojaji Digital
Arts Centre which was conducted by Josh Ulm. The class was very good but I
was alarmed to learn that the W3 or whatever it is called is not or has not
adopted Flash for its new standards. What does this portend for Flash? I was
told that it might not be so popular a year or so from now, which then
raises the question of whether it is worth spending a lot of time on. Anyone
care to comment or critique these statements?

Tim Palmer-Benson
Morgan, VT

To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-manageratshocker [dot] com. Problems to: owneratshocker [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-manageratshocker [dot] com

  Re: FLASH: RE: FLASH's future, David Mendels
  Re: FLASH: RE: FLASH's future, Troy M. Gilbert

  Re: FLASH: addendum: pngs appear very da, Colin Moock

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]