Flasher Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | RE: What you'd like to see in the upcoming Flash 3 book... |
From: | Carrie Dailey |
Date: | Thu, 16 Jul 1998 03:19:37 +0100 |
Well....<gulp>
Slightly MORE of a reply than I anticipated...enough to prompt me to TRY
Fireworks.....not enough to get me to shell out more dough for Freehand. :)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ownershocker [dot] com [ownershocker [dot] com]On">mailto:ownershocker [dot] com]On Behalf Of John
> Dowdell
> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 1998 3:27 PM
> To: flashershocker [dot] com
> Subject: RE: What you'd like to see in the upcoming Flash 3 book...
>
>
> At 4:13 AM 7/15/98, Carrie Dailey wrote, of Fireworks:
> >WHY ELSE would I want it ?? I doubt that it will address my
> other needs any
> >better than Photoshop 5. The ability to create vector images and export
> >them to Flash would have been my main motivation. I really cannot
> >comprehend that MM did not make this possible!!
>
>
> Fireworks was intended for tasks other than a curve-creation tool
> for Flash.
>
> If you wish a curve-creation tool, use FreeHand or some other drawing tool
> -- FreeHand lets you mirror, envelope, fractalize, simplify, very coolly
> autotrace, use graphic search'n'replace, kern to the bone, do
> text-on-path,
> much much more. FreeHand is superlative as a curve-creation tool.
>
> But Fireworks and Flash can use FreeHand as their intense
> curve-creation tool.
>
> Flash goes out to clean, crisp, animated vectors. Fireworks goes out as
> rich, funky pixels.
>
> Try it: produce some graphics in Fireworks, then consider how you'd use
> those brushstrokes and textures in Flash. Vectors can't efficiently
> describe that type of information.
>
> Why use Fireworks rather than Photoshop 5? They actually serve different
> purposes. Photoshop remains the definitive photo-processing tool.
> If you're
> scanning, nothing matches Photoshop's color management, its masking, and
> other image-prepping abilities.
>
> Advantages Fireworks has over Photoshop 5:
>
> -- Good kerning
> -- Text-on-path
> -- Typography and layout abilities
> -- Good brushstrokes (make that *great* brushstrokes!)
> -- Everything editable, all the time
> -- Everything editable, all the time
> -- Animation
> -- Image-slicing
> -- Compression
> -- Imagemaps
> -- JavaScript rollovers
> -- HTML production for image tables
> -- Everything editable, all the time
>
>
> Summary: Fireworks-without-Flash is not quite fish-without-bicycle, but
> close. FreeHand helps with complex curves for Fireworks, Flash, Photoshop,
> other tools. Photoshop is great for photos. Fireworks thinks "web
> graphics"
> from start to finish.
>
> Tip: Try Fireworks. If you create pixel-based graphics, it's very cool.
>
> jd
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> John Dowdell, Macromedia Tech Support, San Francisco CA US
>
> Private email options: http://www.macromedia.com/support/priority.html
> Search technotes: http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
> Entertainment on the web: http://shockrave.macromedia.com/
> Luscious web graphics: http://www.macromedia.com/software/fireworks/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
> email to list-managershocker [dot] com. Problems to: ownershocker [dot] com
> N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
> For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-managershocker [dot] com
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-managershocker [dot] com. Problems to: ownershocker [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-managershocker [dot] com
Replies
RE: What you'd like to see in the upcomi, John Dowdell
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]