Flasher Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | RE: FLASH: ANN: Generator 2, new versions |
From: | Diane Rogers |
Date: | Tue, 23 May 2000 01:52:15 +0100 |
Website fix is underway, thanks for the catch, and sorry for the confusion.
At 01:19 AM 5/23/00 +0100, you wrote:
>John,
>
>Thanks for the explanation, perhaps you could suggest that the Generator
>team revise the text that is currently online as it will clearly induce in
>error.
>I know the dust might still be settling on other pages but after all the
>detail that is given in the performance test another area that could be more
>informative is the pricing structure for the 'GrownUp' Edition of Generator.
>Just saying it start's at xxxUSD and giving an email address isn't much
>info.
>Anyway if the developer edition doesn't watermark the produced files then it
>is a good deal.
>For those that might be considering if it's worth the price some simple math
>:
>The available docs on this product say that it only generates one graphic at
>a time, OK.
> >From the FigLeaf study we can obtain an overestimate of 2 seconds to produce
>a complex database dependent graphic on a 1 processor 128Mb machine. This
>boils down to the fact that under these conditions the developer edition can
>produce in the range of 1800 graphics per hour. So we need to know how many
>users this solution can accommodate without degrading too much. If every
>request to the server triggers a Generator request (worst case scenario) and
>each user views each page for 30 seconds on average, then we have 120 page
>requests per user/hour.
>Gathering all this info tells us that a site with an expected value of 20
>users per hour should, with 95% confidence level, start showing some signs
>of degradation.
>Relaxing the conditions a bit and adapting to real world conditions I think
>we can have this edition serving content for a group of medium sized sites
>with an expected average 'Generator' page request of around 2400 per hour.
>For those that still remember poison distributions you'll see that this
>value is quite good, just check the probability for 4800 page requests per
>hour, a value that would choke the server.
>
>Conclusion :
>Not to bad for the price, not bad at all.
>
>.redstar.
>
>
>flasher is generously supported by...
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>World Animation Celebration - Big Internet Animation Pow Wow Discount Offer
>
>Register before May 25 mention flasher and save 25%!! www.wacfest.com
>
>Be discovered, get a job or have your web series picked up. A big talent
>search for Shockwave
>and Flash animators is happening May 30-June 4 in Hollywood. Featuring
>Rob Burgess, Matt
>Groening, Brad Bird and more. www.wacfest.com
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
>http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email helpchinwag [dot] com
flasher is generously supported by...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
World Animation Celebration - Big Internet Animation Pow Wow Discount Offer
Register before May 25 mention flasher and save 25%!! www.wacfest.com
Be discovered, get a job or have your web series picked up. A big talent search for Shockwave
and Flash animators is happening May 30-June 4 in Hollywood. Featuring Rob Burgess, Matt
Groening, Brad Bird and more. www.wacfest.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email helpchinwag [dot] com
Replies
RE: FLASH: ANN: Generator 2, new version, John Dowdell
RE: FLASH: ANN: Generator 2, new version, .redstar.
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]