Flasher Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | Re: FLASH: rough movie part III. |
From: | John Croteau |
Date: | Wed, 18 Nov 1998 23:58:25 +0000 (GMT) |
Hi Len,
> Is this really reliable/repeatable?
Yes, very.
It seemes to be accurate, reliable and repeatable.
It is probably more reliable than JavaScript when used on the Web which
has a measureable failure rate (somewhere around one in a thousand pages
or worse by many tests).
----------- -----------------------
John Croteau croteauerols [dot] com (mailto:croteauerols [dot] com)
------------- -------------------------
FlashTek (Advanced Websites with Flash) http://www.FlashTek.com/
Flash Central(The Universe Starts Here) http://www.FlashCentral.com/
The Flash Tech Resource (Tech Notes) http://www.FlashCentral.com/tech/
Need a PC ? -- Computer King --
http://www.crownmall.com/computers/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-managershocker [dot] com. Problems to: ownershocker [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-managershocker [dot] com
Replies
RE: FLASH: rough movie part III., Len Harrison
Re: FLASH: rough movie part III., John Croteau
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]