Flasher Archive

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: FLASH: rough movie part III.
From: John Croteau
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 23:58:25 +0000 (GMT)

Hi Len,

> Is this really reliable/repeatable?
Yes, very.
It seemes to be accurate, reliable and repeatable.
It is probably more reliable than JavaScript when used on the Web which
has a measureable failure rate (somewhere around one in a thousand pages
or worse by many tests).

----------- -----------------------
John Croteau croteauaterols [dot] com (mailto:croteauaterols [dot] com)
------------- -------------------------
FlashTek (Advanced Websites with Flash) http://www.FlashTek.com/
Flash Central(The Universe Starts Here) http://www.FlashCentral.com/
The Flash Tech Resource (Tech Notes) http://www.FlashCentral.com/tech/
Need a PC ? -- Computer King --
http://www.crownmall.com/computers/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-manageratshocker [dot] com. Problems to: owneratshocker [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-manageratshocker [dot] com



Replies
  RE: FLASH: rough movie part III., Len Harrison
  Re: FLASH: rough movie part III., John Croteau

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]