uk-netmarketing Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | Re: [uk-netmarketing] RE: banner ads v PR |
From: | s krumholz |
Date: | Mon, 05 Feb 2001 21:35:06 -0000 |
thank you melanie! that was the point i was trying to make. we always try
to coordinate with the PR agency or rep. this helps close the loop.
moreover, when an aspect of a project is more PR related, we are always
happy to assist & defer to the PR group.
and if the PR group is in-house, they still have to work together. you'll
find plenty of examples of intra-departmental territorial fighting. so
nothing is perfect. melanie's point is so spot on.
the reality is, it all depends on how the account is handled, the nature of
the account & the client's involvement or perspective.
i don't think pointing fingers at one entity will help.
>But we will not get anywhere until people stop viewing these different
>functions as being in competition with each other. These activities are
>complementary, and their relative importance is dependent upon the
>product/service, target, objectives of the campaign, etc. The different
>agencies concerned are all specialists, but are specialists in different
>fields.
>
>If they are rigorous and professional in providing their service for the
>client, and if the client highlights the importance of both agencies to the
>success of the project, there should be no problem getting them to
>cooperate.
>
>m
Replies
RE: [uk-netmarketing] Advertising to loc, Jonathan Forster
Replies
RE: [uk-netmarketing] RE: banner ads v P, Melanie BEECH
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]