uk-netmarketing Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | Re: UKNM: Re: Banner ads ... |
From: | Ray Taylor |
Date: | Thu, 30 Jul 1998 14:54:40 +0100 |
Matteo Berlucchi wrote:
>
> Dear Amy,
>
> Two comments on banner ads:
>
> 1) The best way to assess the success of your campaign is not by
> measuring the 'click-through rate' (CTR), but by analysing what the
> people that click on the banner actually do once they are on your site.
>
> For example, let's say you bought 50.000 impressions on site A and B to
> promote your e-commerce site. At the end of the campaign site A has
> generated 5% CTR and B only 2%. Site A will have brought 2.500 people
> and B only 1.000. But if 30% of people coming from site B (300) had
> bought products from you against a 10% of sales from site A visitors
> (250), then the campaign on site B will have proven more successful.
>
To follow this through:
50,000 impressions bought at �25 = �1250
At CTR of 2%..
Total number of clicks = 1000
Cost per click = �1.25
At 30% conversion to sales, cost per sale = �4.17
But 30% conversion to sales? Is this the sort of performance you can
deliver to your clients or was the figure just there for illustration
purposes?
I would have thought even 3% conversion to sales a bit on the optimistic
side, making the cost per sale in this example �41.70. At this rate lets
hope the merchant gets a repeat or multiple order through. And if the
conversion rate drops to 1% on a CTR of 2% and �25 CPM you have taken
the cost of acquiring a single customer above the �100 mark. Worth it?
Replies
Re: UKNM: Re: Banner ads ..., Matteo Berlucchi
Re: UKNM: Re: Banner ads ..., Paul Cook
Replies
UKNM: Re: Banner ads ..., Matteo Berlucchi
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]