uk-netmarketing Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | UKNM: Poor web site design |
From: | Ray Taylor |
Date: | Fri, 23 Jul 1999 11:41:57 +0100 |
From: John Braithwaite <JohnBGBGdirect [dot] com>
>Example of a poor site - www.waterstones.co.uk - how can a company that
>has re-designed a site three times in six months still get it so
>painfully wrong?? (Poor use of colours, frames and brains).
The question of good vs bad web site design comes up more often than
anything else on the list, but the thing that I find lacking in the
discussion is any question of objective criteria, methodology for assessing
web site effectiveness, or substantial research on the subject.
All we get is "I like this", "I don't like this", (obviously from people "in
the know" rather than potential customers).
Everyone has an opinion. Who's got the facts?
Ray Taylor
********************
UKNM is sponsored by Excite UK, visit us at http://www.excite.co.uk.
Email Khalil Ibrahimi khalilexcitecorp [dot] com (mailto:khalilexcitecorp [dot] com) to advertise on Excite.
********************
Change your UKNM subscription use http://www.chinwag.com/uknm.html
Replies
Re: UKNM: Poor web site design, Jo Chipchase
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]