[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: UKNM: Fresh Minds
From: Charlie Osmond
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 12:26:53 +0100

Ben,

You said 4 things which I will deal with separately:

1. Ben Metcalfe wrote: "Why do you say that school leavers are looking for
long-term employment with just one company? I don't think there is any
proof or reason to assume that"

I never said (or implied) this, what on earth makes you think that I did? -
besides it surely has nothing to do with this debate.

2. Ben wrote: "surely school leavers are the people who have taken the
initiative, got off their a***s and learnt skills independently".

I think it is wrong for you to claim that university graduates have not got
off their a***s and learnt skills independently. I know of loads of grads
that have taught themselves all manner of skills outside their university
education. Do you have anything to back up your claim?

3. Ben: "Grads, on the other hand, have been spoon-fed education and had
their learning channelled for them".

Whilst I agree that spoon-feeding does go on within higher education it is
utterly fallacious to generalise and imply that grads take no active role in
their education. Yes, it is usually channelled, but there is good reason for
this - it lends structure to the education process. Are you trying to claim
that education should be unstructured? or unchannelled?

4. Ben wrote "Which of the two is going to survive and perform best in a
commercial environment?"

I am afraid to say that all the governments statistics on this question
point overwhelmingly against you. There is a strong correlation between
those countries which provide university education and economic success.
There is certainly no doubt that the Asian Tigers attribute much of their
success to an increase in further-education provision.

I suppose other ways in which to test this are to look at the CEO's of the
countries top firms. I don't have these figures to hand, and it could be
argued that other factors play a part in actually securing jobs, but I'm
sure it's at least 80% grads. Certainly in terms of remuneration, graduates
earn significantly more than non-graduates over their lifetime.

Now I don't claim that this is because they do a better job, but the
justification for the recent call for a graduate tax is to correct for the
benefit graduates receive from their education - so by implication they do
"survive" best in a commercial environment.

I hope this clarifies some of your questions. But please, if you have
further comments - don't waste the groups time (they must be bored of Fresh
Minds by now) and talk to me direct.

Charlie
__________________________
Charlie Osmond
Fresh Minds Ltd.
w www.freshminds.co.uk
e charlieatfreshminds [dot] co [dot] uk
t 020 8249 8202 (or 8204)
f 0208 467 4773


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
looking for useful books about the new media biz?
check out the UKNM books page for some suggestions:
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing/books.shtml
Email suggestions to: helpatchinwag [dot] com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpatchinwag [dot] com



[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]