Flasher Archive

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: FLASH: Posted without permission Now Does Flash suck
From: Paul
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 21:07:38 +0100

Agreed

----------
>From: "Kevin Jackson" <kjacksonattriskelian [dot] com>
>To: <flasheratchinwag [dot] com>
>Subject: Re: FLASH: Posted without permission Now Does Flash suck
>Date: Tue, Sep 28, 1999, 6:02 pm
>

> I've been following this thread and find it interesting that many are
> complaining that the sky is falling because of the views of a few critics.
> FLASH will not make a site good or bad. The content and the creator will do
> that. You see people rip FLASH sites in here all the time that if you showed
> to most people they would go crazy for.
>
> 1) We have seen a lot of sites so it takes more to impress us.
> 2) The critics at these sites have opinions. Nothing more. As a designer
> take the part that makes sense, address it and make a better site
> 3) If a Flash site doesn't change it is no different than an old magazine
> (or for that matter most HTML sites) Who does want to see the same things
> over and over. Give them a skip button. Change the content. Give them a
> reason to watch and they will.
> 4) You said "Sad to say, I have read the magazine which was given to me
> by one of the radio stations I'm doing and I agree with the arguments about
> flash, graphics and marketing." You didn't say what they said. Regardless
> see point number 2.
> 5) Then you said, "People are tired of Flash. I hear it over and over and
> over again how tired people are of Flash." I have never met anyone who has
> said after seeing any Flash page I showed them that it didn't look as good
> as HTML. Most people are really excited by it.
>
> I think we are hearing from a lot of jaded people. They are probably the
> same type that thought that TV and Moving Pictures were gimmicks and not
> "real" communication mediums. Flash and the Web will continue to evolve and
> things will get to be clich�'s but I don't see people choosing lifeless
> technology to the interactive experience which Flash can be.
>
> Kevin Jackson
> Triskelian Design
> kjacksonattriskelian [dot] com
>
> BTW, many of the people who criticize Flash probably like the "creative,
> artistic sites" on the web. I often find these the least user friendly sites
> on the net and end up thinking why bother. They are generally loved by the
> same type of people who created them. They are like the art films that play
> in the small theatres to rave critical reviews while the masses of people go
> to All-Star Wrestling. I think you can aim somewhere in between and develop
> good content. (As far from Wrestling as possible, I hope)
>
> As Barnum once said, "No one ever went broke underestimating the
> intelligence of the American public." I think some of these people think too
> much instead of asking other people their opinion.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
> email to list-manageratchinwag [dot] com. Problems to: helpatchinwag [dot] com
> N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
> For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-manageratchinwag [dot] com
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-manageratchinwag [dot] com. Problems to: helpatchinwag [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-manageratchinwag [dot] com


[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]