uk-netmarketing Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | Re: [uk-netmarketing] RE: banner ads v PR |
From: | s krumholz |
Date: | Fri, 02 Feb 2001 19:35:49 -0000 |
i totally disagree that creatives & account handlers cannot work together.
and to your point, i've never met a PR agency that tries to work with the
agency
or doesn't muck up an online initiative by not following on their end of
the pitch.
and maybe i am a dreamer. if so, i stand accussed.
s
At 06:06 PM 2/1/01 -0800, you wrote:
>Hang on a second, we have a dreamer in our midst. What? Work together for
>the benefit of the client? But what about my budget? Tell you what, those
>advertising people haven't got a clue, its us PR boys and girls who always
>bring in the creativity to a campaign - but why does the client always
>listen to the ad agency and not us?
>
>Ten years in this business and not once in that time have I met an ad
>agency and PR agency who mutually respect each other and are happy to work
>seamlessly together to benefit the brand.
>
>Maybe it is just one of those things like account handler and creative bod,
>just not meant to be together.
>
>At 23:22 31/01/01 -0500, you wrote:
>>um...as a person who works at an interactive agency, the problem i have
>>with some PR agencies is that they don't always cooperate with the ad
>>agency.
Replies
Re: [uk-netmarketing] RE: banner ads v P, salinka
Re: [uk-netmarketing] RE: banner ads v P, Rod Kohler
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]