[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: UKNM: Libel (was Lastminute.com...website or webhype?)
From: Ian Betteridge
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 20:22:00 GMT

on 6/1/00 2:25 pm, Dan Winchester at danatfreelancers [dot] net wrote:

> I wonder what the libel situation is here? Can the 'publisher' be held
> liable for any (libelous) remarks posted in an open forum? And would a
> web-based forum be different from a newsgroup?

Anyone associated with the distribution of a libel can be sued. For print,
this means everyone from the writer, the editor, publisher, through to
printer, distributor, and ultimately the newsagent. Also, it's traditional
to sue the printer as well as the authors - printers usually avoid court and
settle quickly, thus getting you a tidy sum even if you ultimately lose
(usually pays your legal fees at least). There are several celebrities (no
names, no law suits) who make tidy sums every year threatening libel actions
in this way.

--
m: 07957 235463
- Saying that cultural objects have value is like saying that telephones
have conversations.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
post new media vacancies for free uknm-jobsatchinwag [dot] com
*******************
sponsor the uk-netmarketing list and website, contact
salesatchinwag [dot] com for more details.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpatchinwag [dot] com



Replies
  Re: UKNM: Libel (was Lastminute.com...we, Dan Winchester

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]