[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: RE: UKNM: CallNet0800
From: Rod Begbie
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 10:52:51 GMT

> Actually they suspended registrations because they were found to have a
> massive security flaw, see link
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/991110-000015.html

I doubt this is the cause. Why can't they handle more of the registration
process on the phone. They're swamped, and they know they are.

And I would definitely not describe the lack of SSL as a "massive security
flaw".

The person who manages to packet sniff and intercept a credit card number
will not become rich. The person who gets through a badly set-up firewall
and gets a *database* of credit card numbers will become rich.

If I were after credit card numbers, I wouldn't waste my time on the
inertnet -- i'd be bin-raking at the mall.

rOD.

--
rOD Begbie +---------------------------------------------------------
indiekid | this is me ...................... http://www.begbie.com/
Boston, MA | this is my radio station .... http://sweeney.begbie.com/
------------+ this is what i'm looking at ..... http://log.begbie.com/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
post new media vacancies for free uknm-jobsatchinwag [dot] com
*******************
sponsor the uk-netmarketing list and website, contact
salesatchinwag [dot] com for more details.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpatchinwag [dot] com



Replies
  Re: UKNM: CallNet0800, Steve Mynott

Replies
  Re: UKNM: CallNet0800, Simon Bradley

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]