[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]

Subject: Re: UKNM: plug-in take up/stats
From: Chris Locke
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 14:37:15 +0100

At 10:05 AM 4/24/99 -0700, you wrote:
>How about a specific example. Here's Peppers and Rogers
>1 to 1 Checkpoint Tool and you get the choice: with or
>without Flash.
>Which is "better"?

HTML version is useful

Flash version is like the powerpoint presentation from hell, but some
useful pop-ups (that could have been javascripted?)

Both loaded quickly and once the Flash had settled were equally useful . .
. which is part of the point, Flash used to genuinely add value to the
experience of the information (as in IKEA's 'how to build your shelving'

Rotating text never helped me do anything but fall asleep during

UKNM is sponsored by Excite UK, visit us at http://www.excite.co.uk.
Email Khalil Ibrahimi khalilatexcitecorp [dot] com (mailto:khalilatexcitecorp [dot] com) to advertise on Excite.
Change your UKNM subscription use http://www.chinwag.com/uknm.html

  Re: UKNM: plug-in take up/stats, Stefan Magdalinski
  RE: UKNM: plug-in take up/stats, Martin Lloyd
  Re: UKNM: plug-in take up/stats, Jim Sterne

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]