uk-netmarketing Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | Re: UKNM: Brand-building banners |
From: | Zing!n Diary |
Date: | Mon, 20 Nov 2000 11:42:30 GMT |
Yes banners are a pain in the arse and, yes, they do take up bandwidth but,
then again, TV ads have been interrupting programmes for years. People would
prefer a world without ads but, IMHO, have learnt to accept them in exchange
for decent quality programming. Likewise, people will accept banners if they
are getting decent content.
What most people will not do, however, is click on banners, any more than
they would run straight to the shops on seeing a decent ad on the TV.
...which brings me back to my earlier point about branding.
Paul
==
Paul Carr
Managing Editor
Zingin.com - The UK's finest internet guide.
http://www.zingin.com
_____________________________________________________________
Zingin Mail - FREE from http://www.zingin.com
Making the web worth surfing.
----- Original Message -----
From: Felix Velarde <felixhead-newmedia [dot] com>
To: <uk-netmarketingchinwag [dot] com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 6:00 PM
Subject: RE: UKNM: Brand-building banners
> hi marcus
>
> At 4:23 pm +0000 on 15/11/00, Marcus Exall wrote:
>
> >You [referring to me, felix] wrote:
> >>
> >>'the reason i hate banners so much is that they delay me getting the
> >>information i went to the web page to see, and therefore represent an
> >>invariably negative brand experience. it's as simple az`s that for me.'
> >
> >This only the case with some of the old ad-serving solutions that use
> >javascript. Most ad solutions nowadays do not delay the loading of a
page
> >at all - the loading of the ad and page are totally independent.
> >
> >The delay of the page loading is more likely to do with other factors
such
> >as bandwidth, location of server, size of page files/images and
references
> >to external javascript.
>
> that's the point. we poor internet consumers are entirely limited by
> such things. that should be the primary concern of those who might
> wish to foist such inconsiderate solutions on us. the 'it works on my
> machine so you're inadequate' argument holds no water, and frankly
> makes me want to write publicly about how crass banners are. oh,
> silly me, i already do.
>
> have a nice evening.
>
> felix
> --
>
> Felix Velarde, CEO, Head New Media office + 44 (0)20 7737 7579
> http://www.head-newmedia.com mobile + 44 (0)777 557 2000
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Spending too long reading these emails and not enough time working?
Could be time for a new job. For all the best jobs in IT, New media,
and E-Commerce, come to RevolutionVisit
at London Olympia 2 24/25 November.
See http://www.revolutionvisit.com/1 to find out more.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpchinwag [dot] com
Replies
Re: UKNM: Brand-building banners, Ray Taylor
Re: UKNM: Brand-building banners, Ashley Pomeroy
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]