Flasher Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | <meta>Re: Comparisom::Liquid Motion |
From: | Dave Smith |
Date: | Sat, 16 May 1998 05:28:44 +0100 |
Joshua Cole wrote:
>
> Well...well...well....
> It seems like comments like this are definitely not going to be the ones
> that drive companies to develop bigger and better products for the
> designers and developers.
> instead of dissing it instantly because it is by Microsoft or is not a Macromedia
> product is ignorant.
Funny I only read people "dissing" its performance, not who it was
created by.
I think most of the comments made were based on quality rather than who
makes it,
who bought it etc.
The original post was a comparison and I think by the responses of the
majority it simply
showed liquid motion was not up to par compared to Flash3.
-DG-
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE send: unsubscribe flasher in the body of an
email to list-managershocker [dot] com. Problems to: ownershocker [dot] com
N.B. Email address must be the same as the one you used to subscribe.
For info on digest mode send: info flasher to list-managershocker [dot] com
Replies
RE: Comparisom::Liquid Motion vs. Bucket, Joshua Cole
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]