[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: UKNM: New Media vs Old Hat
From: Peter Borg
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 12:23:12 +0100

--- Dan Leighton <danatuk [dot] psi [dot] com> wrote:
> Tim - I take it your getting over a bad relationship at the moment?

Now now, be nice.

> Sam - can we make him our 'resident ranter'?

He isn't?

> strangely compelling though

It's compelling in the same way as motorway accidents.....

You can just see it can't you? Perhaps due to Tim's eloquent writing
style, or perhaps because you've been there, or perhaps because you
just happen to have seen one of the ads (Pets Pyjamas anyone?) or
most likely all of the above.

Personally, I understand exactly where Tim is coming from in all of
his posts, and whilst they're amusing, they're frightening at the
same time /because/ they're true.

> Tim [dot] Haywardatjwt [dot] com wrote:
> >
> > The reason that .com ads are shite is frighteningly simple.

Peter.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
the UK's totally managed affiliate marketing solution.
ukaffiliates.com >> the net.working
http://www.ukaffiliates.com / salesatukaffiliates [dot] com (mailto:salesatukaffiliates [dot] com)
telephone: 020 7691 1880 / fax: 020 7691 1881
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpatchinwag [dot] com



Replies
  Re: UKNM: New Media vs Old Hat, Dan Leighton

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]