[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: Re: UKNM: New Media vs Old Hat
From: Dan Leighton
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 00:43:19 +0100

Don't know about frightening.

Highly useful articles on what not to do when you go to see an ad agency
perhaps...

power to your elbow tim.

d.

Peter Borg wrote:
>
> --- Dan Leighton <danatuk [dot] psi [dot] com> wrote:
> > Tim - I take it your getting over a bad relationship at the moment?
>
> Now now, be nice.
>
> > Sam - can we make him our 'resident ranter'?
>
> He isn't?
>
> > strangely compelling though
>
> It's compelling in the same way as motorway accidents.....
>
> You can just see it can't you? Perhaps due to Tim's eloquent writing
> style, or perhaps because you've been there, or perhaps because you
> just happen to have seen one of the ads (Pets Pyjamas anyone?) or
> most likely all of the above.
>
> Personally, I understand exactly where Tim is coming from in all of
> his posts, and whilst they're amusing, they're frightening at the
> same time /because/ they're true.
>
> > Tim [dot] Haywardatjwt [dot] com wrote:
> > >
> > > The reason that .com ads are shite is frighteningly simple.
>
> Peter.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
the UK's totally managed affiliate marketing solution.
ukaffiliates.com >> the net.working
http://www.ukaffiliates.com / salesatukaffiliates [dot] com (mailto:salesatukaffiliates [dot] com)
telephone: 020 7691 1880 / fax: 020 7691 1881
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpatchinwag [dot] com



Replies
  Re: UKNM: New Media vs Old Hat, Peter Borg

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]