Flasher Archive
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]
Subject: | Re: FLASH: JPEG quality poor regardless of settings? |
From: | John McKenzie |
Date: | Sun, 21 May 2000 06:27:19 +0100 |
Scott Rossi wrote:
>
> Apparently you can numerically size/position objects in .1 increments.
> Check the position of your imported bitmap in the object inspector and see
> if it falls on a round (integer) number. If not, try setting its position
> to an integer number and see if that makes a difference. I don't know if
> this will help, but it may be worth a shot...
Something else someone at Macromedia Tech support suggested (which worked)
the following:
I had a 1 frame movie I did that exhibited a really weird interaction
between flash elements and a PNG underneath (file was set up to compress the
PNG to JPG on export). Basically, overlayed flash elements on the left of
the image would cause a slight ripple distortion on the right edge of the
PNG. Yes, it was weird. The solution was simply not to "symbolize" the PNG,
and thinking back I may have broken it apart also. This solved the problem
and did not affect file size, so HTH.
John McKenzie
freelance & contract web design
my site's coming when I get other people's sites done!
flasher is generously supported by...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Get the last 100 messages from the flasher list NOW
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher/last100.shtml
Flash books http://www.chinwag.com/flasher/books.shtml
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/flasher or email helpchinwag [dot] com
Replies
Re: FLASH: JPEG quality poor regardless , Scott Rossi
[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]